<zpět do souhrnu zpráv

Výbor Evropského parlamentu pro ŽP hlasoval ve prospěch demokracie

7. 12. 2005 - BRUSEL [EEB / CEE Bankwatch Network / EPHA Environment Network (EEN)]

Skupina evropských ekologických a zdravotních organizací ocenila, že výbor Evropského parlamentu pro životní prostředí projednal návrh na nařízení pro aplikaci Aarhuské úmluvy v evropských institucích. Přes tlak lobbystické organizace chemického průmyslu (CEFIC) odmítl parlamentní výbor restrikce, na kterých se v prosinci 2004 dohodla Rada ministrů ŽP.

Výbor rozhodl, že nařízení musí více vycházet z Aarhuské úmluvy. Například přístup k informacím a účast veřejnosti musí
dodržovat i banky, environmentální NNO mají mít při obraně životního prostředí právo na přístup k evropským soudům.

Pokud bude plenární zasedání parlamentu následovat rozhodnutí výboru, bude muset Parlament a Rada dospět k dohodě pomocí dohadovacího řízení (v rámci procedury spolurozhodování).


==================================
Celý text zprávy v angličtině:

European Parliament vote brings Aarhus Convention application back on track
Environmental and health organisations welcome European Parliament Environment Committee vote in favour of environmental democracy

(Brussels, Belgium, 22 November 2005) -- European environmental and health organisations welcomed the position taken today by the European Parliament’s Environment Committee on a Regulation to apply the Aarhus Convention to the EU institutions. The Committee voted for amendments to bring the Regulation in line with the Aarhus Convention’s requirements and rejected the limitations EU Environmental Ministers had agreed upon in December last year.

The Committee decided that the Regulation should follow the terms of the Aarhus Convention more closely. For instance, access to information and public participation should also include information related to banking activities, and environmental NGOs should have the right to access to justice on the EU level to defend the environment.

John Hontelez, Secretary General of the European Environmental Bureau, said: ”The European Community ratified the Aarhus Convention a year ago. However, the Council of Ministers refused to accept the consequences of this Convention, which is there to strengthen environmental democracy. Access to justice to defend environmental interests is an essential tool for environmental organisations when public authorities fail to apply their own laws. Aarhus requirements apply in the member states and should also apply to the EU’s institutions. The Environment Committee took the right decision to bring this key element back in the second reading.”

Magda Stoczkiewicz, Policy Co-ordinator of CEE-Bankwatch Network, commented: ”We are delighted that the Environment Committee shares our view that banking should not be exempted from Aarhus. It means that the EU’s house bank, the European Investment Bank, will need to adapt its information policy to the rules of the Regulation. It is a very welcome outcome given the fact that the EIB has been advocating for exemption from this Regulation and it should lead to the first binding law for the EIB to release information to interested citizens and people affected by EIB financed projects.”

The environmental organisations are disappointed about the decision of the rapporteur of the Environment Committee, the Finnish conservative Eija Riitta Korhola to vote against the final result of the votes since most of the amendments she proposed were adopted. She was followed by most PPE-members, but a big majority of the Committee supported the resulting report, for final vote in the EP Plenary in December or January.

A remarkable last minute intervention came from CEFIC, the European umbrella of the chemical industry. In a letter it called upon the members of the Environment Committee to vote against amendments on access to information and access to justice rights for EU citizens.

John Hontelez said: “CEFIC wants to limit the role of environmental NGOs. The Commission, in its original proposal for the Regulation, found a good way to implement also the third pillar of the Aarhus Convention: access to justice. The European Community is a prestigious Party to the Aarhus Convention and it should not give the bad example of partial, arbitrary, application. The Environment Committee’s amendments help prevent this.”

If the EP Plenary follows the Environment Committee, Parliament and Council will have to come to an agreement via a conciliation procedure.

Komentáře

< zpět do souhrnu zpráv